| Fit to the invariant-mass distribution of prompt $\Lambda_\text{c}$ in the $4<p_\text{T}<5 \text{GeV}/c$ interval and $<\text{d}N_\text{ch}/\text{d}\eta> = 20.07$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt s = 13.6 \text{TeV}$
|
|
| Ratio of $\Lambda_\text{c}$-to-$\text{D}^0$ cross section, pp collisions at $\sqrt s = 13.6 \text{TeV}$
|
|
| Prompt $\Lambda_\text{c}$ cross section, pp collisions at $\sqrt s = 13.6 \text{TeV}$
|
|
| $\mathrm{D_s^+/D^+}$ production yield ratio measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV compared to forward-rapidity measurements by LHCb in $\mathrm{p-Pb}$ collisions and ALICE measurements in $\mathrm{Pb-Pb}$ collisions
|
|
| Acceptance$\times$Efficiency correction for prompt $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ and $\mathrm{D^+}$ mesons as a function of FT0M percentile and $\pt$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV
|
|
| Fit to the raw-yield distribution of $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ mesons for different BDT non-prompt scores performed to extract the $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ $f_\mathrm{prompt}$ fraction with the cut-variation method
|
|
| Fit to the invariant-mass distribution of $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ and $\mathrm{D^+}$ mesons in the $8< \pt <12$ GeV/$c$ interval and the $70-100\%$ FT0M percentile in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV
|
|
| Fit to the invariant-mass distribution of $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ and $\mathrm{D^+}$ mesons in the $8< \pt <12$ GeV/$c$ interval and the $0-1\%$ FT0M percentile in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV
|
|
| Fit to the invariant-mass distribution of $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ and $\mathrm{D^+}$ mesons in the $2< \pt <4$ GeV/$c$ interval and the $70-100\%$ FT0M percentile in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV
|
|
| Fit to the invariant-mass distribution of $\mathrm{D_s^+}$ and $\mathrm{D^+}$ mesons in the $2< \pt <4$ GeV/$c$ interval and the $0-1\%$ FT0M percentile in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV
|
|
| Comparison of the $\Omega^{-}$ baryons DCA_{z} distribution with and without the strangeness tracking
|
|
| Comparison of the $\Omega^{-}$ baryons DCA_{xy} distribution with and without the strangeness tracking
|
|
| DCA_{z} resolution of $\Omega^{-}$ baryons with and without the strangeness tracking
|
|
| DCA_{xy} resolution of $\Omega^{-}$ baryons with and without the strangeness tracking
|
|
| Invariant mass distribution of strangeness tracked $\Omega^{-}$ baryons
|
|
| $\Omega^{-}$ DCA$_{z}$ fit with MC model in the interval 1.6 $\leq$ $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 2.0 GeV/c
|
|
| $\Omega^{-}$ DCA$_{xy}$ fit with MC model in the interval 1.6 $\leq$ $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 2.0 GeV/c
|
|
| Prompt $\Omega^{-}$ fraction as a function of $p_\mathrm{T}$
|
|
| Comparison between of Ds+-h and D+h measurement away-side observables in differential pT bins of D meson and associated particles
|
|
| Comparison between of Ds+-h and D+h measurement near-side observables in differential pT bins of D meson and associated particles
|
|
| Comparison of near-side observables with PYTHIA 8 predictions in differential pT bins of Ds+ meson and associated particles
|
|
| Comparison of away-side observables with PYTHIA 8 predictions in differential pT bins of Ds+ meson and associated particles
|
|
| Baseline of Ds-h measurement in the different $p_{T}^{assoc}$ intervals considered
|
|
| Near-side width of Ds-h measurement in the different $p_{T}^{assoc}$ intervals considered
|
|
| Away-side width of Ds-h measurement in the different $p_{T}^{assoc}$ intervals considered
|
|
| Away-side yield of Ds-h measurement in the different $p_{T}^{assoc}$ intervals considered
|
|
| Near-side yield of Ds-h measurement in the different $p_{T}^{assoc}$ intervals considered
|
|
| Baseline comparison between Ds-h and D+-h ($p_{T}^{assoc}$ > 0.3 GeV/c)
|
|
| Near-side yield comparison between Ds-h and D+-h ($p_{T}^{assoc}$ > 0.3 GeV/c)
|
|
| Away-side yield comparison between Ds-h and D+-h ($p_{T}^{assoc}$ > 0.3 GeV/c)
|
|
| Away-side widths comparison between Ds-h and D+-h ($p_{T}^{assoc}$ > 0.3 GeV/c)
|
|
| Near-side widths comparison between Ds-h and D+-h ($p_{T}^{assoc}$ > 0.3 GeV/c)
|
|
| Near-side yield comparison between measured Ds-h and PYTHIA8 predictions ($p_{T}^{assoc}$ > 0.3 GeV/c)
|
|
| Away-side yield comparison between measured Ds-h and PYTHIA8 predictions ($p_{T}^{assoc}$ > 0.3 GeV/c)
|
|
| Away-side width comparison between measured Ds-h and PYTHIA8 predictions ($p_{T}^{assoc}$ > 0.3 GeV/c)
|
|
| Near-side width comparison between measured Ds-h and PYTHIA8 predictions ($p_{T}^{assoc}$ > 0.3 GeV/c)
|
|
| Comparison between measured Ds-h and D+-h azimuthal correlation distributions (5 < $p_{T}$ < 8 GeV/c)
|
|
| Comparison between measured Ds-h and D+-h azimuthal correlation distributions (3 < $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/c)
|
|
| Comparison between measured Ds-h azimuthal correlation distribution and PYTHIA8 predictions (1 < $p_{T}$ < 3 GeV/c)
|
|
| Comparison between measured Ds-h azimuthal correlation distribution and PYTHIA8 predictions (3 < $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/c)
|
|
| Comparison between measured Ds-h azimuthal correlation distribution and PYTHIA8 predictions (5 < $p_{T}$ < 8 GeV/c)
|
|
| Comparison between measured Ds-h azimuthal correlation distribution and PYTHIA8 predictions (8 < $p_{T}$ < 16 GeV/c)
|
|
| Comparison between measured Ds-h azimuthal correlation distribution and PYTHIA8 predictions (16 < $p_{T}$ < 36 GeV/c)
|
|
| $\Lambda_c^+$ raw yield distribution as a function of the selection applied on the BDT output score in 4 < $p_T$ < 5 GeV/c interval.
|
|
| Observed elliptic flow as a function of non-prompt fraction for $\Lambda_c^+$ in 4 < $p_T$ < 5 GeV/c interval.
|
|
| Simultaneous fit of the invariant-mass distribution and $v_2$ versus invariant mass of $\Lambda_c^+$ candidates in the 4 < $p_T$< 5 GeV/c interval (0.8 < BDT score to be prompt < 1).
|
|
| Simultaneous fit of the invariant-mass distribution and $v_2$ versus invariant mass of $\Lambda_c^+$ candidates in the 4 < $p_T$< 5 GeV/c interval (0.03 < BDT score to be prompt < 0.8).
|
|
| Simultaneous fit of the invariant-mass distribution and $v_2$ versus invariant mass of $\Lambda_c^+$ candidates in the 4 < $p_T$< 5 GeV/c interval (0 < BDT score to be prompt < 0.03).
|
|
| $v_2$ of Prompt $\Lambda_c^+$ and Prompt $D^0$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared with models and light flavor from published data with $KE_T$ NCQ scaling ($KE_T$<3.3 version)
|
|
| $v_2$ of Prompt $\Lambda_c^+$ and Prompt $D^0$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared with models and light flavor from published data with $p_T$ NCQ scaling
|
|
| $v_2$ of Prompt $\Lambda_c^+$ and Prompt $D^0$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared with models and light flavor from published data with $p_T$ NCQ scaling (logx version)
|
|
| $v_2$ of Prompt $\Lambda_c^+$ and Prompt $D^0$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared with models and light flavor from published data with $KE_T$ NCQ scaling (logx version)
|
|
| $v_2$ of Prompt $\Lambda_c^+$ and Prompt $D^0$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared with models and light flavor from published data with $KE_T$ NCQ scaling
|
|
| $v_2$ of Prompt $\Lambda_c^+$ and Prompt $D^0$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared with light flavor from published data
|
|
| $v_2$ of Prompt $\Lambda_c^+$ and Prompt $D^0$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared with tamu model
|
|
| $v_2$ of Prompt $\Lambda_c^+$ and Prompt $D^0$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared with models
|
|
| $v_2$ of Prompt $\Lambda_c^+$ compared with Prompt $D^0$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV
|
|
| $v_2$ of $\Lambda_c^+$ compared with $D^0$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of prompt and non-prompt $\rm {D^{0}}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared to TAMU model predictions
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of non-prompt $\rm {D^{0}}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared to transport model predictions
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of non-prompt $\rm {D^{0}}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV versus Run 2 results
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^{0}}$, $\rm {D^{+}}$, $\rm {D_{s}^{+}}$, and $\rm {J/\psi}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV for one pT bin verus centrality
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^{0}}$ and $\rm {\Lambda_{c}^{+}}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV (log scale)
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^{0}}$ and $\rm {\Lambda_{c}^{+}}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV (no log scale)
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^{0}}$, $\rm {D^{+}}$, $\rm {D_{s}^{+}}$, $\rm {J/\psi}$, and $\rm {\Lambda_{c}^{+}}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared to TAMU predictions (no log scale)
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^{0}}$, $\rm {D^{+}}$, $\rm {D_{s}^{+}}$, $\rm {J/\psi}$, and $\rm {\Lambda_{c}^{+}}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared to TAMU predictions (log scale)
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^{0, +}}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV in 60-80% centrality versus Langevin model predictions
|
|
| Observed elliptic flow as a function of non-prompt fraction for $\rm{D^{0}}$, $\rm{D^{+}}$, and $\rm{D_{s}^{+}}$ in one pT and centrality interval
|
|
| $\mathrm{D}^{0}$ raw yield distribution as a function of the selection applied on the BDT output score
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^{0}}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared with pions and deuterons from Run 2 in different centrality bins
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^{0}}$, $\rm {D^{+}}$, and $\rm {D_{s}^{+}}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV compared with PHSD in different centrality bins
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^{0}}$, $\rm {D^{+}}$, and $\rm {D_{s}^{+}}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV verus pions from Run 2 in different centrality bins
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^{0}}$, $\rm {D^{+}}$, $\rm {D_{s}^{+}}$, and $\rm {J/\psi}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV verus pions from Run 2
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^{0}}$ and $\rm {D_{s}^{+}}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV versus TAMU
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^{0, +}}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV versus Run 2 results
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D_{s}^+}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV versus Run 2 results
|
|
| $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D_{s}^+}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV versus models
|
|
| Simultaneous fit to invariant-mass distribution and $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^0}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV
|
|
| Simultaneous fit to invariant-mass distribution and $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D^+}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.68 TeV
|
|
| Simultaneous fit to invariant-mass distribution and $\it{v}_{\rm 2}$ of $\rm {D_{s}^+}$ in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.36 TeV
|
|
| Cut variation of $\Lambda_c$ in pt 2 to 3 geV/c in pp collisions at 13.6 TeV
|
|
| p-$\Lambda_c$ inv.mass in mixed-event in pp collisions at 13.6 TeV
|
|
| p-$\Lambda_c$ inv.mass in same-event in pp collisions at 13.6 TeV
|
|
| p-$\Lambda_c$ raw correlation function compare with models included strong interaction in pp collisions at 13.6 TeV
|
|
| p-$\Lambda_c$ raw correlation function fit decomposition in pp collisions at 13.6 TeV
|
|
| p-$\Lambda_c$ raw correlation function fit with coulomb only and background in pp collisions at 13.6 TeV
|
|
| Ds1+/Ds ratio, (BR factorized)
|
|
| Ds2*/Ds ratio, (BR factorized)
|
|
| Ds2*/Ds ratio
|
|
| Ds1+/Ds ratio
|
|
| Ds, Ds1+ and Ds2* cross section
|
|
| Ds1+ Invariant Mass 2<pT<3 GeV/c
|
|
| Ds1+ Invariant Mass 6<pT<8 GeV/c
|
|
| Ds1+ Invariant Mass 12<pT<24 GeV/c
|
|
| Ds2* Invariant Mass 12<pT<24 GeV/c
|
|
| Ds2* Invariant Mass 6<pT<8 GeV/c
|
|
| Ds2* Invariant Mass 2<pT<4 GeV/c
|
|
| Ratio of EECs in p-Pb and pp in different jet pT bins (20-27, 27-40, 40-80 GeV)
|
|
| Beauty production cross section per rapidity unit at midrapidity as a function of $\sqrt{s}$
|
|
| Mid-over-forward rapidity ratio of $\mathrm{B}$ meson production yields in pp collisions compared to $\mathrm{D^0}$ meson measurement
|
|
