| The J/psi nuclear modification factor as a function of pT in the centrality range (70-90)% in Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV for 2.5 < y < 2.75
|
|
| The J/psi nuclear modification factor for six y intervals at forward rapidity as a function of pT, pT < 3 GeV/c, in the centrality range (70-90)% in Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV
|
|
| The J/psi nuclear modification factor for six y intervals at forward rapidity as a function of pT in the centrality range (70-90)% in Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV
|
|
| y-differential coherent J/psi photoproduction cross section at pT < 0.3 GeV/c in the centrality range (70-90)% in Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV compared with one set of models of different scenarios
|
|
| y-differential coherent J/psi photoproduction cross section at pT < 0.3 GeV/c in the centrality range (70-90)% in Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV
|
|
| Eta/Pi0 ratio as function of z for different jet pT intervals
|
|
| Ratio of Pi0 z spectra (Fragmentation function) for data and PYTHIA to parameterization
|
|
| Eta/Pi0 ratio inside jets as function of pT for different jet pT intervals
|
|
| Ratio of fully corrected Eta pT spectra inside jets (data and PYTHIA) to parameterization
|
|
| Eta pT spectra in different jet pT intervals normalized per jet
|
|
| Ratio of fully corrected Pi0 pT spectra inside jets (data and PYTHIA) to parameterization
|
|
| Pi0 pT spectra in different jet pT intervals normalized per jet
|
|
| Ratio of Eta pT spectra in different jet pT intervals to a fit to the inclusive Eta spectrum
|
|
| Eta pT spectra in different jet pT intervals normalized per event
|
|
| Ratio of Pi0 pT spectra in different jet pT intervals to a fit to the inclusive Pi0 spectrum
|
|
| Pi0 pT spectra in different jet pT intervals normalized per event and the inclusive Pi0 spectrum
|
|
| Pi0 pT spectra in different jet pT intervals normalized per event
|
|
| Comparison of corrected Eta spectra inside jets from different reconstruction methods as function of z
|
|
| Comparison of corrected Pi0 spectra inside jets from different reconstruction methods as function of z
|
|
| $\rho_{00}$ parameter of prompt $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ mesons in $0.3<|y|<0.8$ with respect to the reaction plane and a random axis in 30-50% Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02$ TeV
|
|
| $\rho_{00}$ parameter of prompt $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ mesons with $15<p_\mathrm{T}<30$ GeV$/c$ with respect to the reaction and production planes in 30-50% Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02$ TeV
|
|
| $\rho_{00}$ parameter of prompt $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ mesons with $15<p_\mathrm{T}<30$ GeV$/c$ as a function of $|y|$ with respect to the reaction plane in 30-50% Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02$ TeV
|
|
| $\rho_{00}$ parameter of prompt $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ mesons in $0.3<|y|<0.8$ with respect to the reaction plane in 0-10% and 30-50% Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02$ TeV
|
|
| Non-prompt fraction of $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ candidates in 0-10% and 30-50% Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02$ TeV
|
|
| $|\cos{\vartheta^*}|$ differential corrected yields of $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ candidates in two $p_\mathrm{T}$ intervals, for $0.3<|y|<0.8$ in 30-50% Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02$ TeV
|
|
| Invariant-mass distributions of $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ candidates in two $p_\mathrm{T}$ and $|\cos{\vartheta^*}|$ intervals, for $0.3<|y|<0.8$ in 30-50% Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02$ TeV
|
|
| Direct photon pt (MB and HM)
|
|
| $\rm D^{0}$-tagged raw jet axis distribution, $\Delta R_{\rm STD,D}$, for $R = 0.4$ in $10 < p_{\rm T,ch~ jet} < 20 {\rm ~ GeV}/c$
|
|
| Fully corrected $\rm D^{0}$-tagged jet axis distribution, $\Delta R_{\rm STD,D}$, compared to PYTHIA 8 for $R = 0.4$ in $10 < p_{\rm T,ch~ jet} < 20 {\rm ~ GeV}/c$
|
|
| Feed-down fraction in $\rm D^{0}$-tagged jet axis difference, $\Delta R_{\rm STD,D}$, in $10 < p_{\rm T, ch ~ jet} < 20 ~ {\rm GeV}/c$ and $5 < p_{\rm T, D^{0}} < 20 ~ {\rm GeV}/c$ for $R=0.4$.
|
|
| Delta Phi Distribution of heavy-flavor decay electrons and charged particles, Pb-Pb 30 - 50% Centrality and pp
|
|
| Delta Phi Distribution of heavy-flavor decay electrons and charged particles, Pb-Pb 0 - 10% Centrality and pp
|
|
| Delta Phi Distribution of heavy-flavor decay electrons and charged particles with background uncertainty, Pb-Pb 30 - 50% Centrality
|
|
| Delta Phi Distribution of heavy-flavor decay electrons and charged particles with background uncertainty, Pb-Pb 0 - 10% Centrality
|
|
| Away-Side Nuclear Modification factor ($I_{AA}$) of Pb-Pb in 30 - 50% Centrality
|
|
| Away-Side Nuclear Modification factor ($I_{AA}$) of Pb-Pb in 0 - 10% Centrality
|
|
| Near-Side Nuclear Modification factor ($I_{AA}$) of Pb-Pb in 30 - 50% Centrality
|
|
| Near-Side Nuclear Modification factor ($I_{AA}$) of Pb-Pb in 0 - 10% Centrality
|
|
| Comparison of Per-Trigger Associated Away-Side Yield in Pb-Pb 30 - 50% Centrality and pp
|
|
| Comparison of Per-Trigger Associated Away-Side Yield in Pb-Pb 0 - 10% Centrality and pp
|
|
| Comparison of Per-Trigger Associated Near-Side Yield in Pb-Pb 30 - 50% Centrality and pp
|
|
| Comparison of Per-Trigger Associated Near-Side Yield in Pb-Pb 0 - 10% Centrality and pp
|
|
| Comparison of $\lambda_{\theta}$ with UPC measurement
|
|
| dNdcostheta vs costheta in Pb--Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV using Helicity Frame
|
|
| Invariant mass distribution of dimuon pairs for 0.5 < |cos\theta| < 0.6 in Pb-Pb collsions at 5.02 TeV
|
|
| Invariant mass distribution of dimuon pairs for 0.2 < |cos\theta| < 0.3 in Pb-Pb collsions at 5.02 TeV
|
|
| Invariant mass distribution of dimuon pairs for 0.0 < |cos\theta| < 0.1 in Pb-Pb collsions at 5.02 TeV
|
|
| Rg vs pt (HM)
|
|
| Rg vs pt (MB)
|
|
| Photon yield vs multiplicity (pp13TeV)
|
|
| Direct photon pt (HM)
|
|
| Direct photon pt (MB)
|
|
| r vs pt HM (updated)
|
|
| r vs pt MB (updated)
|
|
| y-differential upsilon(1S) and upsilon(2S) pp cross section at 13 TeV compared to ICEM+FONLL
|
|
| pT differential Upsilon(1S) and upsilon(2S) cross section in pp collisions at 13 TeV compared to ICEM+FONLL
|
|
| Integrated Upsilon(1S) and Upsilon(2S) cross section as a function of energy compared to ICEM+FONLL model calculations
|
|
| pT differential Upsilon(1S) and upsilon(2S) cross section in pp collisions at 13 TeV compared to LHCb
|
|
| y-differential upsilon(1S) pp cross section at 13 TeV compared to lower energy ALICE data
|
|
| y-differential upsilon(1S) and upsilon(2S) pp cross section at 13 TeV compared to LHCb
|
|
| y-differential upsilon(1S) and upsilon(2S) pp cross section at 13 TeV
|
|
| pT differential Upsilon(1S) and Upsilon(2S) cross section in pp collisions at 13 TeV
|
|
| pT differential Upsilon(1S) cross section in pp collisions at 13 TeV compared to lower energy ALICE data
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 30-50% PbPb collisions - soft drop zcut = 0.2, comparison with models
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% PbPb collisions - soft drop zcut = 0.4, comparison with models
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% PbPb collisions - soft drop zcut = 0.2, comparison with models
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% PbPb collisions - Dynamical grooming a = 1.0 z > 0.2, comparison with models
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% PbPb collisions - Dynamical grooming a = 1.0, comparison with models
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in pp collisions - additional grooming methods comparison with PYTHIA8
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in pp collisions - selection of grooming methods
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in pp collisions - additional grooming methods
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% PbPb collisions - selection of grooming methods
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% PbPb collisions - additional grooming methods
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% PbPb collisions - original grooming methods
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 30-50% PbPb collisions - selection of grooming methods
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 30-50% PbPb collisions - additional grooming methods
|
|
| D0-tagged jets compared to semi-inclusive jets and to PYTHIA 8 on left and to their ratio on right for $\alpha=3$, $R=0.4$ in 10 < $p_{\rm T, ch. jet}$ < 20 GeV/c.
|
|
| D0-tagged jets compared to semi-inclusive jets and to PYTHIA 8 on left and to their ratio on right for $\alpha=2$, $R=0.4$ in 10 < $p_{\rm T, ch. jet}$ < 20 GeV/c.
|
|
| D0-tagged jets compared to semi-inclusive jets and to PYTHIA 8 on left and to their ratio on right for $\alpha=1.5$, $R=0.4$ in 10 < $p_{\rm T, ch. jet}$ < 20 GeV/c.
|
|
| D0-tagged jets compared to semi-inclusive jets and to PYTHIA 8 on left and to their ratio on right for $\alpha=1$, $R=0.4$ in 10 < $p_{\rm T, ch. jet}$ < 20 GeV/c.
|
|
| EEC distribution for 40-60GeV charged jets in pp collision (theory comparison included)
|
|
| Feed-down fraction in D$^{0}$-tagged jet angularity in 10 < $p_{\rm T, ch. jet}$ < 20 GeV/c and 5 < $p_{\rm T,D^{0}}$ < 20 GeV/c for R = 0.4, $\alpha=1$.
|
|
| Fully corrected jet angularity distributions of D0-tagged jet compared to semi-inclusive jets and to PYTHIA 8 for $\alpha=3$, $R=0.4$ in 10 < $p_{\rm T, ch. jet}$ < 20 GeV/c.
|
|
| Fully corrected jet angularity distributions of D0-tagged jet compared to semi-inclusive jets and to PYTHIA 8 for $\alpha=2$, $R=0.4$ in 10 < $p_{\rm T, ch. jet}$ < 20 GeV/c.
|
|
| Fully corrected jet angularity distributions of D0-tagged jet compared to semi-inclusive jets and to PYTHIA 8 for $\alpha=1.5$, $R=0.4$ in 10 < $p_{\rm T, ch. jet}$ < 20 GeV/c.
|
|
| D0-tagged jet raw angularity distributions for $\alpha=1$ in 10 < $p_{\rm T, ch. jet}$ < 20 GeV/c and 8 < $p_{\rm T,D^{0}}$ < 12 GeV/c.
|
|
| Invariant mass distribution of D$^{0}$-tagged jet candidates with 10 < $p_{\rm T, ch. jet}$ < 20 GeV/c and 8 < $p_{\rm T,D^{0}}$ < 12 GeV/c for R = 0.4.
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% and 30-50% PbPb collisions - Soft Drop z_cut = 0.4
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% and 30-50% PbPb collisions - Dynamical grooming a = 2.0, z > 0.2
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% and 30-50% PbPb collisions - Dynamical grooming a = 1.0, z > 0.2
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% and 30-50% PbPb collisions - Dynamical grooming a = 0.5, z > 0.2
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% and 30-50% PbPb collisions - Soft Drop z_cut = 0.2
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% and 30-50% PbPb collisions - Dynamical grooming a = 2.0
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% and 30-50% PbPb collisions - Dynamical grooming a = 1.0
|
|
| Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting for R = 0.2 jets in 0-10% and 30-50% PbPb collisions - Dynamical grooming a = 0.5
|
|
| Away-Side width comparison between measured Λc-h and PYTHIA8 predictions for 0.3 < pT(assoc) < 1 GeV/c
|
|
| Away-Side yield comparison between measured Λc-h and PYTHIA8 predictions for 0.3 < pT(assoc) < 1 GeV/c
|
|
| Away-Side yields and widths comparison between measured Λc-h and PYTHIA8 predictions
|
|
| Near-Side width comparison between measured Λc-h and PYTHIA8 predictions for 0.3 < pT(assoc) < 1 GeV/c
|
|
| Near-Side yield comparison between measured Λc-h and PYTHIA8 predictions for 0.3 < pT(assoc) < 1 GeV/c
|
|
