Search for Preliminary Figures

Search for Preliminary Figures

RAA vs charged particle density of inclusive jpsi at mid-rapidity at sNN = 5.02 (2018 dataset), 2.76 and 0.2 TeV
Comparison of antideuteron-to-deuteron ratio in pp and in p-Pb collisions
Per-trigger associated yield from h-K correlations - MC comparison
Ratios of per-trigger yield of the away-side peak (K0-h/h-h) - multiplicity -MC comparison
Ratios of per-trigger yield of the near-side peak (K0-h/h-h) - multiplicity -MC comparison
Ratios of per-trigger yield of the near-side peak (h-K0/h-h) - multiplicity -MC comparison
Ratios of per-trigger yield of the away-side peak (h-K0/h-h) - multiplicity -MC comparison
Ratios of per-trigger yield of the away-side peak (K0-h/h-h) as a function of p_T^{assoc} -MC comparison
Ratios of per-trigger yield of the near-side peak (K0-h/h-h) as a function of p_T^{assoc} -MC comparison
Ratios of per-trigger yield of the near-side peak (h-K0/h-h) as a function of p_T^{assoc} -MC comparison
Ratios of per-trigger yield of the away-side peak (h-K0/h-h) as a function of p_T^{assoc} - MC comparison
\Delta\varphi Projection of h-K^0_S - MC comparison
Comparison of antiproton-to-proton ratio in pp and in p-Pb collisions
Isolated photon-hadron correlation functions in pp and p–Pb at sqrt(s) = 5.02 TeV, remaining zT bins
Signal region and background region correlation function comparison in p–Pb at sqrt(s) = 5.02 TeV
Rg of inclusive jets in pp at 13 TeV, response matrix
zg of inclusive jets in pp at 13 TeV, response matrix
nSD of inclusive jets in pp at 13 TeV, response matrix
Fully unfolded nSD distribution in semi-central and pp collisions with zcut=0.2 (theory comparison)
Fully unfolded zg distribution in semi-central and pp collisions (theory comparison)
Performance of the event-by-event constituent subtraction method on the residual pT distribution in embedded PYTHIA with SD z=0.2 for different Rmax values
Performance of the event-by-event constituent subtraction method on the Rg distribution in embedded PYTHIA with SD z=0.2 for different Rmax values
Performance of the event-by-event constituent subtraction method on the Rg distribution in embedded PYTHIA with SD z=0.4
Performance of the event-by-event constituent subtraction method on the Rg distribution in embedded PYTHIA with SD z=0.2
Fully unfolded Rg distribution in semi-central and pp collisions with zcut=0.4 (theory comparison)
Fully unfolded Rg distribution in semi-central and pp collisions with zcut=0.2 (theory comparison)
ML Pb--Pb Spectrum R = 0.4, 0-10%, Compared to AB method
Performance of the jet-by-jet and event-by-event constituent subtraction method on the Rg distribution in embedded PYTHIA
Fully unfolded nSD distribution in pp collisions compared to PYTHIA8
R=0.2 azimuthal charged jet resolution for 0-10% Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV
R=0.2 Uncorrected (raw) hadron+jet $\Delta_{recoil}$ vs $\Delta\phi$ distributions for $30 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}^{ch}} < 40$ GeV/c in 0-10% Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{\it{s}_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV
R=0.2 hadron+jet $\Delta\phi$ distribution for $30 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}^{ch}} < 40$ GeV/c in 0-10% Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{\it{s}_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, compared to PYTHIA
Subleading prong residual, R=0.4
Subleading prong purity, R=0.4
zg for R=0.4, zcut=0.2
zg for R=0.2, zcut=0.2
theta_g for R=0.4, zcut=0.2
theta_g for R=0.2, zcut=0.2
Fully unfolded Rg distribution in pp collisions compared to Pythia8 with SD zcut=0.4
Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting in pp collisions for dynamical time grooming
Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting in pp collisions for dynamical $k_{\mathrm{T}}$
Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting in pp collisions for leading $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ with z > 0.2
ML Raa Fragmentation Bias Curves with Model Comparisons R = 0.4, 0-10%
Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting in pp collisions for leading $k_{\mathrm{T}}$
Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting in pp collisions - comparison of grooming methods with PYTHIA
Hardest $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ jet splitting in pp collisions - comparison of grooming methods
Dynamical grooming: $z_g$ in pp collisions
Dynamical grooming: $\theta_g$ in pp collisions
Fully unfolded Rg distribution in semi-central and pp collisions with zcut=0.4
Fully unfolded nSD distribution in semi-central and pp collisions
Fully unfolded zg distribution in semi-central and pp collisions
Fully unfolded Rg distribution in semi-central and pp collisions with zcut=0.2
Lepton charge asymmetry of mu from W in p-Pb at 8.16 TeV compared to theory
Differential cross section of W+ at backward vs theory
Differential cross section of W- at backward vs theory
Differential cross section of W+ at forward vs theory
Differential cross section of W- at forward vs theory
Cross section of mu+ from W+ in p-Pb at 8.16 TeV compared to theory
Cross section of mu- from W- in p-Pb at 8.16 TeV compared to theory
<cos 4[Psi_2(p_T^a) - Psi_2(p_T^t)]> with etagap > 0.8 for various trigger particle pT in centrality 0-5%, 20-30% and 40-50%
<cos 4[Psi_2(p_T^a) - Psi_2(p_T^t)]> with etagap > 0.8 in centrality 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%. 30-40% and 40-50%
NSC(3,2_pt) and NSC(2,3_pt) and the comparison to hydrodynamic calculations in centrality 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40% and 40-50%
NSC(3,2_pt) and NSC(4,2_pt) and the comparison to hydrodynamic calculations in centrality 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40% and 40-50%
r3 with etagap > 0.8 for various trigger particle pT in centrality 0-5%, 20-30% and 40-50%
r3 with etagap > 0.8 in centrality 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40% and 40-50%
r2 with etagap > 0.8 for various trigger particle pT in centrality 0-5%, 20-30% and 40-50%
r2 with etagap > 0.8 and the comparison to hydrodynamic calculation in centrality 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40% and 40-50%
v4{2}/v4[2] with etagap > 0.8 and the comparison to hydrodynamic calculation in centrality 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40% and 40-50%
v3{2}/v3[2] with etagap > 0.8 and the comparison to hydrodynamic calculation in centrality 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40% and 40-50%
v2{2}/v2[2] with etagap > 0.8 and the comparison to hydrodynamic calculation in centrality 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40% and 40-50%
Ratio of combined $\pi^0$ meson measurement to fit in referece measurement in pp collisions at 8 TeV with theory
Ratio of individual $\pi^0$ meson measurements to combined fit in the reference measurement in pp collisions at 8 TeV
Ratio of combined $\eta$ meson measurement to fit in p-Pb collisions at 8.16 TeV
Ratio of combined $\pi^0$ meson measurement to fit in p-Pb collisions at 8.16 TeV
ML Full Jet Raa, R = 0.4, 0-10%
ML Pb--Pb Full Jet Spectrum R = 0.4, 0-10%
ML Raa with Fragmentation Bias Curves
Acceptance-times-efficiency for J/psi as function of CosTheta and Centrality in the Helicity reference frame
Fit to the corrected J/psi distribution as a function of cosTheta in 0-20% and 60-90% centrality classes
Fit to the J/psi distribution as a function of cosTheta for 0-20% and 60-90% centrality classes
Self normalization yield of omega-meson at 6.0-8.0 GeV/c at forward-rapidity (2.5<y<4.0) as a function of the charged particle multiplicity at mid-rapidity (|\eta|<1.0) compared with Pythia8 predictions (Color rope + hadronic rescattering)
  • Fig. Group : Low mass dimuons
  • PWG : PWG-LF (Light Flavour Spectra)
  • Energy: 13 TeV
  • System p-p
Self normalization yield of omega-meson at 2.5-3.0 GeV/c at forward-rapidity (2.5<y<4.0) as a function of the charged particle multiplicity at mid-rapidity (|\eta|<1.0) compared with Pythia8 predictions (Color rope + hadronic rescattering)
  • Fig. Group : Low mass dimuons
  • PWG : PWG-LF (Light Flavour Spectra)
  • Energy: 13 TeV
  • System p-p
Self normalization yield of omega-meson at 0.5-1.0 GeV/c at forward-rapidity (2.5<y<4.0) as a function of the charged particle multiplicity at mid-rapidity (|\eta|<1.0) compared with Pythia8 predictions (Color rope + hadronic rescattering)
  • Fig. Group : Low mass dimuons
  • PWG : PWG-LF (Light Flavour Spectra)
  • Energy: 13 TeV
  • System p-p
Self normalization yield of phi-meson at 6.0-8.0 GeV/c at forward-rapidity (2.5<y<4.0) as a function of the charged particle multiplicity at mid-rapidity (|\eta|<1.0) compared with Pythia8 predictions (Color rope + hadronic rescattering)
  • Fig. Group : Low mass dimuons
  • PWG : PWG-LF (Light Flavour Spectra)
  • Energy: 13 TeV
  • System p-p
Self normalization yield of phi-meson at 2.5-3.0 GeV/c at forward-rapidity (2.5<y<4.0) as a function of the charged particle multiplicity at mid-rapidity (|\eta|<1.0) compared with Pythia8 predictions (Color rope + hadronic rescattering)
  • Fig. Group : Low mass dimuons
  • PWG : PWG-LF (Light Flavour Spectra)
  • Energy: 13 TeV
  • System p-p
Self normalization yield of phi-meson at 0.5-1.0 GeV/c at forward-rapidity (2.5<y<4.0) as a function of the charged particle multiplicity at mid-rapidity (|\eta|<1.0) compared with Pythia8 predictions (Color rope + hadronic rescattering)
  • Fig. Group : Low mass dimuons
  • PWG : PWG-LF (Light Flavour Spectra)
  • Energy: 13 TeV
  • System p-p
Quarkonia production as a function of mid-rapidity charged-particle multiplicity in pp collisions at 13 TeV
  • Fig. Group : Upsilon -> mu+mu-
  • PWG : PWG-DQ (Dileptons and Quarkonia)
  • Energy: 13 TeV
  • System p-p
Rg of inclusive jets in pp at 13 TeV, systematic uncertainties
zg of inclusive jets in pp at 13 TeV, systematic uncertainties
nSD of inclusive jets in pp at 13 TeV, systematic uncertainties
Rg of D0-tagged jets in pp at 13 TeV, response matrix
zg of D0-tagged jets in pp at 13 TeV, response matrix
nSD of D0-tagged jets in pp at 13 TeV, response matrix
Rg of D0-tagged jets in pp at 13 TeV, systematic uncertainties
zg of D0-tagged jets in pp at 13 TeV, systematic uncertainties
nSD of D0-tagged jets in pp at 13 TeV, systematic uncertainties
Rg of D0-tagged jets in pp at 13 TeV, feed-down fraction
zg of D0-tagged jets in pp at 13 TeV, feed-down fraction
nSD of D0-tagged jets in pp at 13 TeV, feed-down fraction
Rg of D0-tagged jets in pp at 13 TeV, sideband subtraction, pT D0 12-16 GeV/c