Search for Preliminary Figures

Dielectron spectrum with Rapp predictions
Dielectron spectrum with PHSD predictions
J/ψ yield at forward-rapidity as a function of the charged particle multiplicity densities at mid-rapidity
  • Fig. Group : J/psi->mu+mu-
  • PWG : PWG-DQ (Dileptons and Quarkonia)
  • Energy: 13 TeV
  • System p-p
Eta/Pi0 in pPb collisions at 5TeV with K/pi - 0-20 & 60-100% V0A
Eta/Pi0 in pPb collisions at 5TeV - ZNA sliced
Eta/Pi0 in pPb collisions at 5TeV - CL1 sliced
Eta/Pi0 in pPb collisions at 5TeV - V0A sliced
Neutral Meson QpPb in pPb collisions at 5TeV together with other particles - 60-100 % V0A
Neutral Meson QpPb in pPb collisions at 5TeV together with other particles - 60-100 % CL1
Neutral Meson QpPb in pPb collisions at 5TeV together with other particles - 60-100 % ZNA - Hybrid Ncoll
Neutral Meson QpPb in pPb collisions at 5TeV together with other particles - 0-20 % ZNA - Hybrid Ncoll
Neutral Meson QpPb in pPb collisions at 5TeV together with other particles - 0-20 % V0A
Neutral Meson QpPb in pPb collisions at 5TeV together with other particles - 0-20 % CL1
Eta Meson QpPb in pPb collisions at 5TeV - ZNA sliced - Hybrid Ncoll
Eta Meson QpPb in pPb collisions at 5TeV - V0A sliced
Eta Meson QpPb in pPb collisions at 5TeV - CL1 sliced
Neutral Pion QpPb in pPb collisions at 5TeV - ZNA sliced - Hybrid Ncoll
Neutral Pion QpPb in pPb collisions at 5TeV - CL1 sliced
Neutral Pion and Eta Meson Invariant Yield in pPb collisions at 5TeV compared to generators - 40-60% V0A
Neutral Pion and Eta Meson Invariant Yield in pPb collisions at 5TeV compared to generators - 20-40% V0A
Neutral Pion and Eta Meson Invariant Yield in pPb collisions at 5TeV compared to generators - 60-100% V0A
Neutral Pion and Eta Meson Invariant Yield in pPb collisions at 5TeV compared to generators - 0-20% V0A
Eta Meson Invariant Yield in pPb collisions at 5TeV - V0A sliced
Eta Meson Invariant Yield in pPb collisions at 5TeV - CL1 sliced
Eta Meson Invariant Yield in pPb collisions at 5TeV - ZNA sliced
Neutral Pion Invariant Yield in pPb collisions at 5TeV - ZNA sliced
Neutral Pion Invariant Yield in pPb collisions at 5TeV - CL1 sliced
Neutral Pion Invariant Yield in pPb collisions at 5TeV - V0A sliced
Dielectron spectrum with cocktail incl EPS09-modified charm
Dielectron spectrum with cocktail incl EPPS16-modified charm
Dielectron spectrum with cocktail incl binary scaled charm
RAA comparison of inclusive jpsi->ee at 5 TeV and 2.76 TeV
  • Fig. Group : Pb-Pb 5.02 TeV Run 2015
  • PWG : PWG-DQ (Dileptons and Quarkonia)
  • Energy: 2.76 TeV
  • ,
  • Energy: 5.02 TeV
  • System Pb-Pb
K*± /K and K*0/K vs. energy in different collision systems
Spectra of Omega for different centrality classes in Xe-Xe collisions at 5.44 TeV
Spectra of Xi for different centrality classes in Xe-Xe collisions at 5.44 TeV
Spectra of K0S for different centrality classes in Xe-Xe collisions at 5.44 TeV
2D Charged particles Balance Functions in p-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV - 70-80% (1.0 < pT < 2.0 GeV/c)
2D Charged particles Balance Functions in p-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV - 70-80% (0.2 < pT < 2.0 GeV/c)
2D Charged particles Balance Functions in p-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV - 30-40% (1.0 < pT < 2.0 GeV/c)
2D Charged particles Balance Functions in p-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV - 30-40% (0.2 < pT < 2.0 GeV/c)
2D Charged particles Balance Functions in p-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV - 0-10% (1.0 < pT < 2.0 GeV/c)
2D Charged particles Balance Functions in p-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV - 0-10% (0.2 < pT < 2.0 GeV/c)
C_4/C_2 of net-proton distributions as a funtion of collision energy
C_3/C_2 of net-proton distributions as a funtion of collision energy
C_4/C_2 of net-proton distributions vs centrality in Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV and 5.02 TeV
C_3/C_2 of net-proton distributions vs centrality in Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV and 5.02 TeV
C_4 of net-proton distributions vs centrality in Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV and 5.02 TeV
C_3 of net-proton distributions vs centrality in Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV and 5.02 TeV
C_2 of net-proton distributions vs centrality in Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV and 5.02 TeV
<pbar> vs centrality in Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV and 5.02 TeV
<p> vs centrality in Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV and 5.02 TeV
Charged particles Balance Functions RMS DeltaPhi in Pb-Pb vs centrality (comparison Run1 and Run2 energies)
Charged particles Balance Functions RMS DeltaEta in Pb-Pb vs centrality (comparison Run1 and Run2 energies)
Charged particles Balance Functions Away side Yields in p-Pb at 5.02 TeV vs centrality (2016 data sample)
Charged particles Balance Functions Near Side Yields in p-Pb at 5.02 TeV vs centrality (2016 data sample)
Charged particles Balance Functions Total Yields in p-Pb at 5.02 TeV vs centrality (2016 data sample)
Charged particles Balance Functions RMS DeltaPhi in p-Pb at 5.02 TeV vs centrality (2016 data sample)
Charged particles Balance Functions RMS DeltaEta in p-Pb at 5.02 TeV vs centrality (2016 data sample)
Charged particles Balance Functions Away Side Yields in Pb-Pb at 5.02 TeV vs centrality
Charged particles Balance Functions Near Side Yields in Pb-Pb at 5.02 TeV vs centrality
Charged particles Balance Functions Total Yields in Pb-Pb at 5.02 TeV vs centrality
Charged particles Balance Functions RMS DeltaPhi in Pb-Pb at 5.02 TeV vs centrality
Charged particles Balance Functions RMS DeltaEta in Pb-Pb at 5.02 TeV vs centrality
2D Charged particles Balance Functions at 5.02 TeV - 70-80% - 1 < pT trigger, pT ass < 2 GeV/c
2D Charged particles Balance Functions at 5.02 TeV - 30-40% - 1 < pT trigger, pT ass < 2 GeV/c
2D Charged particles Balance Functions at 5.02 TeV - 0-5% - 1 < pT trigger, pT ass < 2 GeV/c
2D Charged particles Balance Functions at 5.02 TeV - 70-80%
2D Charged particles Balance Functions at 5.02 TeV - 30-40%
2D Charged particles Balance Functions at 5.02 TeV - 0-5%
Net-lambda moments versus DeltaEta in 30-40% central events
Net-lambda moments versus DeltaEta in 0-10% central events
Net-lambda moments versus centrality, first and second moments only
Net-lambda moments versus centrality, first moments only
Net-lambda moments versus centrality, with MC comparison
Net-lambda moments versus centrality
Example lambda minv weights for Identity Method analysis
Example lambda invariant mass peak for Identity Method analysis
K*0 signal after background subtraction in Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV in Production plane
Invariant mass distribution before background subtraction in Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV in Production plane
v_{2} \{2\} of \Lambda(\bar{\Lambda}) in 0-20\% V0A multiplicity class compared to published CMS
v_{2} \{2\} of K^{0}_{S} in 0-20\% V0A multiplicity class compared to published CMS
v_{2} \{2\} of inclusive charged hadrons in 0-20\% V0A multiplicity class compared to published CMS
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} / n_{q} with KE_{T} scaling in 40-60\% V0A multiplicity class
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} / n_{q} with KE_{T} scaling in 20-40\% V0A multiplicity class2
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} / n_{q} with KE_{T} scaling in 0-20\% V0A multiplicity class
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} / n_{q} in 40-60\% V0A multiplicity class
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} / n_{q} in 20-40\% V0A multiplicity class
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} / n_{q} in 0-20\% V0A multiplicity class
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} in 40-60\% V0A multiplicity class
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} in 20-40\% V0A multiplicity class
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} of inclusive and identified hadrons in 0-20\% V0A multiplicity class
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} of \phi in various V0A multiplicity classes
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} of \Lambda(\bar{\Lambda}) in various V0A multiplicity classes
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} of K_{S}^{0} in various V0A multiplicity classes
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} of charged protons in various V0A multiplicity classes
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} of charged kaons in various V0A multiplicity classes
v_{2}^{sub} \{2,|\Delta\eta| < 0.4\} of charged pions in various V0A multiplicity classes
Charged Jet RAA in Pb-Pb 5.02TeV (R=0.2, R=0.3)
Charged Jet RAA in Pb-Pb 5.02TeV for 50-80% centrality (R=0.2, R=0.3)
Charged Jet RAA in Pb-Pb 5.02TeV for 30-50% centrality (R=0.2, R=0.3)