User

Roles
Anonymous

Public Preliminary figures by analysis

[PWG-DQ] Hard Probes 2026 : Preliminary and performance figures

Comparison of lambda theta polarization parameters as a function of pT in pp 13.6 TeV with NRQCD model
Comparison of lambda theta polarization parameters as a function of pT in pp 13.6 TeV with ICEM and CGC+NRQCD model
ψ(2S)-to-J/ψ ratio vs Npart in Run 3 OO collisions in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity NOT in log scale
ψ(2S)-to-J/ψ ratio vs Npart in Run 3 OO collisions in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity
Comparison of J/psi polarization parameters in OO at 5.36 TeV with different NRQCD model prediction
Comparison of J/psi polarization parameters in OO at 5.36 TeV with PbPb at 5.02 TeV
J/psi polarization parameters as a function of pT in OO collision at 5.36 TeV

$\rm{J}/\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity [ICHEP26]

J/$\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ vs pT in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity in the centrality class 20-60% vs midrapidity and models
J/$\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ vs pT in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity in the centrality class 0-20% vs midrapidity and models
J/$\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ vs pT in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity in the centrality classes 0-20% and 20-60%
J/$\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ vs pT in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity in the centrality class 20-60% vs p-Pb, Pb-p and Pb-Pb
J/$\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ vs pT in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity in the centrality class 0-20% vs LF and HF
J/$\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ vs pT in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity in the centrality class 0-20% vs Pb-Pb collisions in 0-10%
J/$\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ vs pT in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity in the centrality class 20-60% vs Pb-Pb collisions in 30-50%
J/$\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ vs pT in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity in the centrality class 20-60% vs midrapidity
J/$\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ vs pT in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity in the centrality class 0-20% vs midrapidity
J/$\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ vs pT in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity in the centrality class 0-20% vs Tsinghua transport model
J/$\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ vs pT in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity in the centrality class 20-60% vs Tsinghua transport model
J/$\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ vs pT in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity in the centrality class 20-60%
J/$\psi$ $\nu_{2}$ vs pT in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in the dimuon channel at forward rapidity in the centrality class 0-20%

Preliminary/Derived Figures: Evidence for parton energy loss in oxygen$-$oxygen collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.36}$ TeV

Compilation of All Available Non-Strange Nuclear Modification Factors ROO - Linear pT Axis
Compilation of All Available Nuclear Modification Factors ROO - Linear pT Axis
Compilation of All Available Identified Particle Nuclear Modification Factors ROO
Compilation of All Available Non-Strange Nuclear Modification Factors ROO
Compilation of All Available Nuclear Modification Factors ROO

$D^{+}_{s}$-hadron azimuthal correlations in OO collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=5.36 TeV

Ds-h azimuthal correlation away-side IAA
Ds-h azimuthal correlation near-side IAA
Ds-h azimuthal correlation near-side width comparison between pp and OO collisions
Ds-h azimuthal correlation away-side width comparison between pp and OO collisions
Ds-h azimuthal correlation away-side yield comparison between pp and OO collisions
Ds-h azimuthal correlation near-side yield comparison between pp and OO collisions
Ds-h azimuthal correlation distribution comparison between pp and OO collisions (5 < $p_{T}$ < 8 GeV/c)

$\Sigma_{c}^{++,0}$ -- proton azimuthal correlations in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13.6$ TeV

Opposite-baryon and same-baryon $\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0}\text{--p}$ azimuthal correlations for $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0}) < 12$ GeV/$c$ and $0.4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\text{p}) < 4.5$ GeV/$c$ compared with models
Opposite-baryon and same-baryon $\Sigma_{\rm c}^{++}\text{--p}$ azimuthal correlations for $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\Sigma_{\rm c}^{++}) < 12$ GeV/$c$ and $0.4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\text{p}) < 4.5$ GeV/$c$ compared with models
Opposite-baryon$-$ same-baryon $\Sigma_{\rm c}^{++}\text{--p}$ azimuthal correlations for $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\Sigma_{\rm c}^{++}) < 12$ GeV/$c$ and $0.4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\text{p}) < 4.5$ GeV/$c$ compared with models
Opposite baryon $-$ same-baryon $\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0}\text{--p}$ azimuthal correlations for $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0}) < 12$ GeV/$c$ and $0.4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\text{p}) < 4.5$ GeV/$c$ compared with models
Ratio of associated $\Sigma_{\rm c}^{++}\text{--p}$ over $\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0}\text{--p}$ yield for $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0, ++}) < 12$ GeV/$c$ and $0.4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\text{p}) < 4.5$ GeV/$c$ compared with models
Ratio of associated near-side $\Sigma_{\rm c}^{++}\text{--p}$ over $\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0}\text{--p}$ yield for $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0, ++}) < 12$ GeV/$c$ and $0.4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\text{p}) < 4.5$ GeV/$c$ compared with models
Ratio of associated away-side $\Sigma_{\rm c}^{++}\text{--p}$ over $\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0}\text{--p}$ yield for $4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0, ++}) < 12$ GeV/$c$ and $0.4 < p_{\mathrm{T}}(\text{p}) < 4.5$ GeV/$c$ compared with models
Associated away-side $\Delta\varphi$ $\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0, ++}$-p yield in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0, ++}} 4$-$12$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 0.4$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Associated Near-side $\Delta\varphi$ $\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0, ++}$-p yield in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0, ++}} 4$-$12$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 0.4$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Associated $\Delta\varphi$ integrated $\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0, ++}$-p yield in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Sigma_{\rm c}^{0, ++}} 4$-$12$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 0.4$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models

Minimum bias production of prompt D$^{*+}$ in pp collision at $\sqrt{s} = 13.6$ TeV

Overlay of prompt $D^{*+}$ and $D^{0}$ cross sections in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV
Fit to the invariant-mass distribution of prompt $D^{*+}$ in the $1.5 < p_{T} < 2 \text{GeV}/c$ interval, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV
$D^{*+}/D^{0}$ ratio in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV
Prompt $D^{*+}$ cross section in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV compared with FONLL
Prompt $D^{*+}$ cross section in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV compared with Run 2 measurement

Xic0 self-normalized yield in pp collisions at 13.6 TeV

Raw yield of Xic0​ in pT​ bin [5, 6] GeV/c for the 0–100% FT0M, 0>INEL
Raw yield of Xic0​ in pT​ bin [5, 6] GeV/c for the 70–100% FT0M multiplicity class
Xic0 self-normalized yields in pp collisions at 13.6 TeV compare with EPOS4HQ
Xic0 self-normalized yields in pp collisions at 13.6 TeV compare with Pythia
Xic0 self-normalized yields in pp collisions at 13.6 TeV

[HP2026] Soft omega prodution in pp collisions at 5.02 TeV

Spectrum of omega measured in the dielectron channel
Ratio of omega/pi as a function of pT
mean pt of omega and other particles vs mass
Integrated omega/pi ratio with models

Measurement spin alignment of prompt $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV

$\rho_{00}$ of prompt $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV, compared to previous measurement of $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ and inclusive $J/\psi$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02TeV
$\rho_{00}$ of prompt $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV, compared with previous measurement at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02TeV
$\rho_{00}$ of prompt $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV
Fit of corrected $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ mesons yield as a function of $cos\theta^*$ in Pb-Pb collisions with two $p_\mathrm{T}$ intervals
Raw yield as a function of BDT selections and extracted contributions from prompt and non-prompt $\mathrm{D}^{*+}$ mesons with $15<p_\mathrm{T}<30~\mathrm{GeV}/c$
Invariant mass distribution in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.36 TeV in two intervals of $p_\mathrm{T}$

Measurement of $D^0$ cross sections in pp collisions at √s = 5.36 TeV

Ratio of the prompt $\mathrm{D}^{0}$ production cross section in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6~\mathrm{TeV}$ to that at $\sqrt{s}=5.36~\mathrm{TeV}$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$, compared with the FONLL prediction.
Prompt $\mathrm{D}^0$ cross section in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5.36\ \mathrm{TeV}$ compared with $\sqrt{s} = 13.6\ \mathrm{TeV}$
Fit to the invariant-mass distribution of prompt $\mathrm{D}^{0}$ in the $3.5 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 4 \mathrm{GeV}/c$ interval, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5.36 \ \mathrm{TeV}$
Prompt $\mathrm{D}^0$ cross section in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5.36\ \mathrm{TeV}$ compared with FONLL
Prompt $\mathrm{D}^0$ cross section in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5.36\ \mathrm{TeV}$ compared with Run 2 measurement

$\Lambda_{c}^{+}$ -- proton azimuthal correlations in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13.6$ TeV

Associated $\Delta\varphi$ integrated $\Lambda_{c}$-p yield in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 3$-$12$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 0.4$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Associated away-side peak yield $\Lambda_{c}$-pyield in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 3$-$12$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 0.4$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Associated near-side peak yield $\Lambda_{c}$-pyield in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 3$-$12$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 0.4$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Unlike-sign - like-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 3$-$5$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 0.4$-$1.0$ GeV/$c$ with models
Unlike-sign - like-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 3$-$5$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 1.0$-$2.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Unlike-sign - like-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 3$-$5$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 2.5$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Unlike-sign - like-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 5$-$8$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 2.5$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Unlike-sign - like-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 5$-$8$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 1.0$-$2.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Unlike-sign - like-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 5$-$8$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 0.4$-$1.0$ GeV/$c$ with models
Unlike-sign - like-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 8$-$12$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 0.4$-$1.0$ GeV/$c$ with models
Unlike-sign - like-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 8$-$12$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 2.5$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Unlike-sign - like-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 8$-$12$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 1.0$-$2.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Unlike-sign - like-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 12$-$24$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 1.0$-$2.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Unlike-sign - like-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 12$-$24$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 2.5$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Like-sign and Unlike-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 12$-$24$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 1.0$-$2.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Like-sign and Unlike-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 12$-$24$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 2.5$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Like-sign and Unlike-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 8$-$12$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 2.5$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Like-sign and Unlike-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 8$-$12$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 1.0$-$2.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Like-sign and Unlike-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 8$-$12$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 0.4$-$1.0$ GeV/$c$ with models
Like-sign and Unlike-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 5$-$8$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 0.4$-$1.0$ GeV/$c$ with models
Like-sign and Unlike-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 5$-$8$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 1.0$-$2.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Like-sign and Unlike-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 5$-$8$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 2.5$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Like-sign and Unlike-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 3$-$5$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 2.5$-$4.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Like-sign and Unlike-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 3$-$5$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 1.0$-$2.5$ GeV/$c$ with models
Like-sign and Unlike-sign $\Lambda_{c}$-p Azimuthal Correlations in $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\Lambda_{c}} 3$-$5$ GeV/$c$ and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{p} 0.4$-$1$ GeV/$c$ with models

$D^{+}_{s}$-identified particles azimuthal correlations in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=13.6 TeV

Ds-K ULS-LS near-side yield
Ds-$\pi$ ULS-LS azimuthal correlation distribution (5 < $p_{T}$ < 8 GeV/c) comparison with models
Ds-K ULS-LS azimuthal correlation distribution (5 < $p_{T}$ < 8 GeV/c) comparison with models
Ds-K ULS and LS azimuthal correlation distribution comparison (8 < $p_{T}$ < 16 GeV/c) comparison with models
Ds-K ULS and LS azimuthal correlation distribution comparison (5 < $p_{T}$ < 8 GeV/c) comparison with models
Ds-$pi$ ULS and LS azimuthal correlation distribution comparison (5 < $p_{T}$ < 8 GeV/c) comparison with models
Ds-$\pi$ ULS-LS azimuthal correlation distribution (1 < $p_{T}$ < 3 GeV/c) comparison with models
Ds-K ULS-LS near-side yield comparison with models