B2 coefficient VS RT in Transverse Region + Pythia comparison

Scope: PWG
PWG-LF (Light Flavour Spectra)
Energy
13 TeV
System
p-p
Figure Image
Figure image (.eps)
Figure Caption

Coalescence parameter $B_2$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm T}$/$A$, in several $R_{\mathrm T}$ intervals in the Transverse ($60^{\circ} < |\Delta\phi| < 120^{\circ}$) region. Lines represent the statistical uncertainties while boxes represent the systematic uncertainties. 
The comparison with Pythia 8.3 expectations is shown as well.

Detail description

Dataset: LHC16d, LHC16e, LHC16g, LHC16h, LHC16i, LHC16j, LHC16k, LHC16l, LHC16o, LHC16p, LHC17c, LHC17e, LHC17f, LHC17h, LHC17i, LHC17j, LHC17k, LHC17l, LHC17m, LHC17o, LHC17r, LHC18b, LHC18d, LHC18e, LHC18f,  LHC18g, LHC18h, LHC18i, LHC18j, LHC18k, LHC18l, LHC18m, LHC18n, LHC18o, LHC18p

Track recon: ESD, Pass2 for 2016+2017 runs and Pass3 for 2018 runs

Selection cuts: |eta|<0.9, |y|<0.5, |DCAxy|<0.1cm, |DCAz|<1 cm